首页> 外文OA文献 >Collaboration and co-ownership in research: dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team
【2h】

Collaboration and co-ownership in research: dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team

机译:研究中的合作和共同所有权:患者研究合作伙伴与研究团队中专业研究人员之间的动态和对话

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background Different strategies by which patients can be involved in research include consultation, control and collaboration. This article focuses on collaboration within research teams and considers this with reference to a research project about setting a social-scientific agenda for health research from the perspectives of patients with a chronic kidney disease (CKD). Objective To examine the dynamics and dialogues in a collaboration between patient research partners and professional researchers. Design A responsive methodology was used in the research project. Two patient research partners participated in the research team. Twenty-seven patients with CKD and parents of young children with CKD were interviewed, seven focus groups were organized and observations were held at a dialysis centre. Results During the collaboration, the research partners and professional researchers engaged in a mutual learning process in all stages of the project. The professional researchers gave the research partners a sense of ownership in the research process. The research partners could relate to the lives of patients by using their experiential knowledge. In the context of collaborative working, this helped shape an agenda for research. Conclusion and discussion The active involvement of patients as research partners can add value to a research strategy, especially when research partners and professional researchers engage in a dialogue that is open, inclusive and deliberative. Issues for discussion include the possibility of 'over-involvement', the research profile and training of research partners and whether participation of patients is restricted to certain types of research. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
机译:背景技术患者可以参与研究的不同策略包括咨询,控制和协作。本文着重研究团队内部的协作,并参考一个研究项目,从慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的角度为健康研究设定社会科学议程,以此为参考。目的研究患者研究合作伙伴与专业研究人员之间的合作关系,探讨动态和对话。设计在研究项目中使用了响应式方法。两个患者研究伙伴参加了研究小组。采访了27名CKD患者和年幼的CKD儿童父母,组织了七个焦点小组,并在透析中心进行了观察。结果在合作期间,研究合作伙伴和专业研究人员在项目的所有阶段都参与了相互学习的过程。专业的研究人员在研究过程中给予研究伙伴以主人翁感。研究伙伴可以通过使用他们的经验知识来联系患者的生活。在协作工作的背景下,这有助于制定研究议程。结论与讨论患者作为研究合作伙伴的积极参与可以为研究策略增加价值,尤其是当研究合作伙伴与专业研究人员进行公开,包容和协商的对话时。讨论的问题包括“过度投入”的可能性,研究概况和研究伙伴的培训以及患者的参与是否仅限于某些类型的研究。 ©2011布莱克威尔出版有限公司。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号